TECHNICAL TOOLS, PSYCHOLOGICAL TOOLS, AND PERSUASIVE MEDIATION IN AN ACTIVITY SYSTEM, A VYGOTSKIAN JUSTIFICATION AND A THREE-DIMENSIONAL ACCOUNT OF TOOLS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29121/JISSI.v2.i1.2026.34Keywords:
Activity Theory, Vygotsky, Mediating Artifacts, Persuasive ToolsAbstract
This article clarifies how “tools” function as mediators in cultural-historical activity theory by integrating Vygotsky’s analytic distinction between tools and signs with an activity-system model that separates a general Tool element from a Persuasive tool element. We argue that the Tool node is best read as a Vygotskian technical tool complex whose functional primacy is outward-oriented transformation of objects and material processes, while the Persuasive tool node is best read as a Vygotskian psychological tool complex whose primacy is semiotic regulation of attention, valuation, interpretation, and coordinated action. Two cautions guide the proposal: Vygotsky’s distinction is not an ontological split between “material” and “symbolic,” and the decomposition is a modeling choice justified when persuasion, legitimacy, or alignment work is constitutive of the activity’s object. Building on Engeström’s systemic account of mediation, we show how technical tools couple to operations, divisions of labor, and repeatable production routines, whereas persuasive tools operate through genres, scripts, metrics regimes, and visual-semiotic artifacts that frame what counts as evidence and what actions appear reasonable. We further propose a three-dimensional account in which every tool—technical or psychological—has (i) a material dimension (carriers, infrastructures, access), (ii) a symbolic dimension (culturally organized meanings and values), and (iii) a pragmatic dimension (instrument-in-use formed through utilization schemes and instrumental genesis). Finally, we outline how distinguishing technical and persuasive tools improves diagnosis of contradictions (measurement–meaning, access–authority, skill formation) and supports expansive learning analyses in education, research, and professional practice. The framework is intended for welfare-oriented, ethically governed persuasion in veterinary work.
References
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Orienta-Konsultit.
Hullman, J., and Diakopoulos, N. (2011). Visualization Rhetoric: Framing Effects in Narrative Visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17(12), 2231–2240. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2011.255
Leont'ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, Consciousness, and Personality. Prentice-Hall.
Rabardel, P. (1995). Les Hommes et Les Technologies: Approche Cognitive Des Instruments Contemporains. Armand Colin.
Rabardel, P., and Bourmaud, G. (2003). From Computer to Instrument System: A Developmental Perspective. Interacting with Computers, 15(5), 665–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(03)00058-4
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, and E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.
Wartofsky, M. W. (1979). Models: Representation and the Scientific Understanding. D. Reidel Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9357-0_10
Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as Action. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195117530.001.0001
Wertsch, J. V. (2007). Mediation. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, and J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Vygotsky (178–192). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521831040.008
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Federico De la Colina Flores , Heriberto Rodríguez Frausto, Tzitzi De la Colina García , Paul Alexis de la Colina Flores (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
With the licence CC-BY, authors retain the copyright, allowing anyone to download, reuse, re-print, modify, distribute, and/or copy their contribution. The work must be properly attributed to its author.
It is not necessary to ask for further permission from the author or journal board.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
